If the USA had a national Peace Movement, Obama would not be our President-Elect right now. Dennis Kucinich (D-Oh) would have been the nominee for the Democrats and Ron Paul (R-Tx) would have been nominated from the GOP and Cynthia McKinney (G) and Ralph Nader (I) would have had seats at debates. What we have here in the US is an “anti-war” movement that is selective in its opposition to war. It seems that for many of the national organizations, Democratic Wars are okay, while Republican Wars are bad. That’s why we need a movement with integrity and vision that doesn’t exist to shill for the Democrats, but exists to be the clarion call that ALL violence is wrong and solving problems using violence or the threat of violence is a crime against humanity and always criminally prosecutable—whether George Bush or Barack Obama is the one making these threats or promising escalation of violence. The use of violence is inherently wrong in an individual and millions of times worse coming from a state.
Filed under: 3rd party, Action Alert!, activism, Anti-War, Cindy Sheehan, cynthia mckinney, elections, grassroots democracy, News, Peace, Political Websites, president, presidential, presidential race Tagged: | Barack Obama, John McCain, Ron Paul
[…] Op-Ed News by way of On The Wilder Side Peace is not an absence of war: it’s an absence of preparing for war or an absence of using […]